A professor once shared this video with me and I thought it was worth sharing, especially as a lens to view Adichie’s priorities for writing “Half of a Yellow Sun.” Chimamanda Adichie gave this talk for TED in 2009, a few years after the publishing of “Half of a Yellow Sun.” I know the video is almost 20 minutes long, but it is worth a watch.

In the speech, Adichie warns of the sometimes limiting nature of Literature. Her constant reference to the danger of a “single story” or creating incomplete representations, stereotypes and a false sense of what is authentically African, reminded me of all of the doubles that are present in “Half of a Yellow Sun.” For example, the twins Olanna and Kainene, who are opposite in appearance, personality and experience. Even Kainene is a double in herself, as her father says “she is like two.” The respective men in their lives are also a double of each other, with Odenigbo having such strong opinions and a strong presence, and Richard who is more reserved (spoiler alert! the parallel between Richard’s impotence and Odenigbo’s sexual deviance that occurs I think in part three is a clear double). What is most interesting is that not only Adichie managed to stray away from the single story by observing Nigerian through a non-european perspective, but by creating characters who all have very different experiences even within Nigeria.

At the risk of generalizing, I think that Adichie’s words might also shed some light on the priorities of the  other Nigerian writers we have read so far. At one part of the speech, Adiche says that the most disempowering thing that a writer can do is to tell a person’s story secondly. For example, starting a story with the arrival of colonial powers creates a completely different story than starting with the natives. This makes me think of the structure of “Things Fall Apart.” Achebe begins the novel by establishing the culture and lives of the Igbo community. Although the story makes a strong point by ending with the Europeans, they come in secondly, making the Nigerian story the definitive aspect. This can also be seen in “Death and the Kings Horseman” where the play begins with almost a complete immersion into the community’s culture. As Adichie says, these authors give their Nigerian subjects power by making their stories more prominent.


About kwhudkins

I am a Junior at American University studying Literature and Multi-Ethnic Studies.

2 responses »

  1. ethanmcleod says:

    The element of your post that most intrigues me is the quote from Adichie that speaks about the “most disempowering thing that a writer can do”. It is very easy to sympathize with Richard (personally, at least), and yet this remark coming from the mouth of a native Nigerian like Adichie helps to explain the resentment by such characters as Madu or Kainene’s parents toward him. No matter how hard he tries throughout the story, it always seems as though he is telling the Biafrans’ story second-hand. He even tries to send in news articles to correct for the misunderstanding and bigoted international press reporting on Biafra, but his writing is not believable to British publishers. Even as he progressively, and rather quickly, becomes a member of the new nation of Biafra, he is instructed to report on the affairs of the country through the medium of a public relations staff. Ironically, only through literally telling the Biafrans’ story second-hand to a PR staff can he disseminate authentic information about the struggles and warfare going on in the country.

  2. Bethany says:

    I love Adichie’s TED talk! I have watched it multiple times and I think it is extremley applicable to her writing. What I think is really interesting about the single story that the West believes originates in the Biafran war. The pictures of all the starving children first started being published during the Biafran war and now that’s how alot of westerners perceive the ENTIRE continent. I helped raise money for the famine in East Africa last semester and through that experience I encountered alot of people with the attitude of ‘isn’t there always a famine in Africa?, aren’t there always starving children?, hasn’t poverty always been an issue?’ and the fact is that these generalizations just are not true!

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s